[dancer-users] Erroneous session-cookie setting behaviour in Dancer2

[Punter]

On 03/04/2013 01:01 AM, Rik Brown wrote:
> Yeah you're right.  It is probably better to put a "negative" cookie
> there if the session is non-existent/empty.   I think I was going with a
> "that sounds like more code/more complexity than it's worth", but the
> privacy concerns (I've never cared about what cookies sites are throwing
> at me, for better or for worse) are fair enough I suppose.

Thanks. Are you one of Dancer2's core developers by the way?