[dancer-users] Coming soon: Dancer::SessionFactory::Cookie

[David Golden]

Thank you for the compliment. It took a lot of thought and work to get it
that compact. :-)

Sereal is faster and more compact than other serialization options, both of
which are crucial for cookies.

I can't see a good case for supporting other options.

Why do you ask?

David
On Jan 14, 2013 4:49 AM, "Nicolas R." <atoomic at cpan.org> wrote:

> really nice ! short and effective, there is a lot to learn from your code
> on secure cookie storage
> is there a plan to make sereal optional ?
>
>
> 2013/1/9 David Golden <xdg at xdg.me>
>
>> FWIW, once someone ships a new Dancer 2 dev release with the recent
>> session changes that were merged, I have the next generation of
>> cookie-based sessions ready to go.
>>
>> https://github.com/dagolden/dancer-sessionfactory-cookie
>>
>> It's even more secure than Dancer::Session::Cookie was.
>>
>> David
>>
>> --
>> David Golden <xdg at xdg.me>
>> Take back your inbox! → http://www.bunchmail.com/
>> Twitter/IRC: @xdg
>> _______________________________________________
>> dancer-users mailing list
>> dancer-users at dancer.pm
>> http://lists.preshweb.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/dancer-users
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dancer-users mailing list
> dancer-users at dancer.pm
> http://lists.preshweb.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/dancer-users
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.preshweb.co.uk/pipermail/dancer-users/attachments/20130114/5922ca1e/attachment.htm>