[Dancer-users] Starman vs Plack::Handler::Apache2 my results

[Jesse Thompson]

I'm guessing that you had Apache more favorably tuned than Starman

These are the equivalent Apache settings you used for Starman

StartServers 1
MaxClients 10

Also, you might want to make sure these settings are in alignment for 
your test.

MinSpareServers
MaxSpareServers
MaxRequestsPerChild

Jesse

On 9/12/2012 8:59 PM, David C gurugeek wrote:
> Hello again,
> I am running this page
>
> http://dancer.1.ai using
> plackup -E deployment -s Starman --workers=10 -p 5001 -a ./bin/app.pl >
>
> and this page
> http://elephant.1.ai/perl using Plack::Handler::Apache2
>
> in my tests Plack::Handler::Apache2 seems to be faster. Shouldn't it be the other way around ?
> I did try both with curl  + safari and chrome benchmarks and even http://whichloadsfaster.com :)
> Thanks for your comments
> Regards
> David
> _______________________________________________
> Dancer-users mailing list
> Dancer-users at perldancer.org
> http://www.backup-manager.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/dancer-users