[Dancer-users] ssl questions
David Precious
davidp at preshweb.co.uk
Tue May 31 18:46:53 CEST 2011
On Tuesday 31 May 2011 17:24:55 Brian E. Lozier wrote:
> This is helpful, thank you. If the logic for having plack/psgi apps
> behind a proxy is already handled in Plack::Middleware::ReverseProxy,
> why is this happening again in Dancer? Is there an intention for
> Dancer app developers to use Plack::Middleware modules or have all the
> "important" ones recreated inside Dancer? Is there an advantage to
> using behind_proxy => 1 vs. using Plack::Middleware::ReverseProxy
> directly? It looks like all the middleware does is reset some
> environment variables so the Dancer app will think it's being run
> directly.
It's a pretty important feature which is going to be required by some people,
and some people could object to installing additional modules to make it work.
Feel free to use Plack::Middleware::ReverseProxy instead though if you're
happy to install it :)
Cheers
Dave P
--
David Precious ("bigpresh")
http://www.preshweb.co.uk/
"Programming is like sex. One mistake and you have to support
it for the rest of your life". (Michael Sinz)
More information about the Dancer-users
mailing list