[Dancer-users] Conditional HTTP proposal

[Oleg A. Mamontov]

On Feb 15, 2011, at 7:49 PM, damien krotkine wrote:

> On 12 February 2011 13:01, Alexis Sukrieh <sukria at sukria.net> wrote:
>> Hi Flavio, Oleg,
>> 
>> 
>> I'd like to underline some remarks regarding this discussion:
>> 
> 
> [...]
> 
>> By isolating these extra code lines in a plugin we protect ourselves for
>> future issues regarding that part of the code.
>> 
>> My concerns are mainly maintenance ones, I've nerver doubted the benefit of
>> having this feature (altough a Plack middleware exists and we should keep it
>> very simple).
>> 
>> So, do we have an agreement?
> 
> Having followed the discussion but not said anything as of yet, I'd
> like to say that I fully agree with what Alexis just said. It looks to
> me as a good compromise, and an adequate solution for users in need
> for this feature.

This feature is one of basic principles in hyper text transfer protocol :)

Perhaps creating something like 'Dancer::Plugin::Static' (implemented 
static files serving functionality completely) is more adequate way?

> _______________________________________________
> Dancer-users mailing list
> Dancer-users at perldancer.org
> http://www.backup-manager.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/dancer-users


-- 
Cheers,
Oleg A. Mamontov

mailto:  oleg at mamontov.net

jabber:  lonerr at charla.mamontov.net
icq uin: 79-521-617
cell:    +7-903-798-1352