[Dancer-users] Rebasing an application

[sawyer x]

Hmm... why Middleware, if I may ask?

On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 1:37 PM, Flavio Poletti <polettix at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
>     the module to solve my reverse proxy issues is ready and I like the
> idea of addressing them in one single point.
>
> Do you think that naming it Dancer::Middleware::Rebase is a problem? I
> wouldn't want to invade the namespace if this is considered "precious".
>
> Cheers,
>
>     Flavio.
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 9:15 AM, sawyer x <xsawyerx at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Franck worked on an issue of mounting several Dancer apps under different
>> paths. Apparently, it's possible to do so with PSGI. Perhaps that will meet
>> your needs.
>>
>> Franck, do you remember what I'm talking about?
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 3:54 AM, Flavio Poletti <polettix at gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>    I'm working on a module for rebasing Dancer applications. In short, it
>>> manipulates various $env components to make the request appear as coming to
>>> a different host and path, in order to address various problems that I
>>> encounter when I deploy the application behind a reverse proxy.
>>>
>>> It is implemented as a Plack middleware (inspired by
>>> Plack::Middleware::ReverseProxy but with a different approach) and I'd like
>>> some feedback about the module name. My idea is to call it
>>> Dancer::Middleware::Rebase, following the suggestions in
>>> http://advent.plackperl.org/2009/12/day-23-write-your-own-middleware.html
>>>
>>> Thoughts?
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>>    Flavio.
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Dancer-users mailing list
>>> Dancer-users at perldancer.org
>>> http://www.backup-manager.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/dancer-users
>>>
>>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.backup-manager.org/pipermail/dancer-users/attachments/20110209/5e4d71d2/attachment.htm>