[Dancer-users] do something after sending response

[Nick Knutov]

I agree, forking is another way to do it, but as far as I know, it can 
lead to very high load. Also, dying process is a heavy operation, as far 
as I remember.

12.08.2011 0:27, David Precious пишет:
> On Thursday 11 August 2011 18:17:47 David Precious wrote:
>> Another possible alternative would be to fork a new process that will do
>> the  stuff in the background, whilst the original process continues
>> onwards to send the response back to the client.
>
> For the time being, at least, this is probably the easiest option.
>
> Something like:
>
>      hook after =>  sub {
>          if (fork) {
>              # parent - do nothing
>          } else {
>              # Child - sleep for a while
>              sleep 50;
>              exit;
>          }
>      };
>
> With a quick test, that works as expected.  (The exit is required, so that the
> child process doesn't then go on return control to Dancer.)
>
>
>
>

-- 
Best Regards,
Nick Knutov
http://knutov.com
ICQ: 272873706
Voice: +7-904-84-23-130