[Dancer-users] No more collisions of routes with multiple Dancer(1) apps!

[Perlover]

Hello,
Thanks for reply.
But I will use my own patched version of Dancer-1 (i don't have a time for
adaptation for Dancer2)
If you don't want patch - it's your choose of cause as of authors.
Ok, lets your users will have a problems with multi apps...
Bye
28.11.2011 17:42 пользователь "Alexis Sukrieh" <sukria at sukria.net> написал:

> This kind of patches are actually not really what we watn to do since
> we have dancer2 on the way which is going to solve these collisions.
>
> A better way to help the project is to test an upgrade of your app to
> Dancer 2. Thanks.
>
> 2011/11/23 Perlover <perlover at perlover.com>:
> > Hello All,
> >
> > I made a changes for Dancer1!
> > Please to see pull request of https://github.com/sukria/Dancer/pull/703
> >
> > I added new option to config: routes_per_app
> >
> > If it is true in config routes will be work only for applications
> > where i its defined. If not true - it works as worked before (backward
> > compatible)
> > I wrote a test for it
> > All tests are passed
> >
> > Now i will test it in my real project
> > If i will find a some bugs i will notice you
> >
> > Best regards, Perlover
> >
> > P.S. And dear author(s) - please approve & merge other commit too - it
> > fix bug with request->header() -
> > https://github.com/sukria/Dancer/pull/702
> > _______________________________________________
> > Dancer-users mailing list
> > Dancer-users at perldancer.org
> > http://www.backup-manager.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/dancer-users
> >
> >
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.backup-manager.org/pipermail/dancer-users/attachments/20111129/6441efbd/attachment.htm>